Table 2. Within subject correlation coefficients.
MAP | %OS-SIGlobal | %OS-SILAD | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
r | p-value | r | p-value | r | p-value | |
%-OS-SIGlobal | 0.326 | 0.002* | - | - | - | - |
%-OS-SILAD | 0.604 | <0.001* | - | - | - | - |
%-Flow (QLAD) | 0.699 | <0.001* | 0.452 | <0.001* | 0.651 | <0.001* |
ΔDO2 | 0.784 | <0.001* | 0.361 | 0.002* | 0.586 | <0.001* |
ΔMvO2 | 0.820 | <0.001* | 0.228 | 0.082 | - | - |
ΔDO2 - ΔMvO2 | 0.795 | <0.001* | 0.433 | <0.001* | - | - |
ΔScsO2 | 0.301 | 0.012* | 0.402 | 0.001* | - | - |
ΔΩ | 0.335 | 0.005* | 0.290 | 0.024* | - | - |
ΔO2er | -0.342 | 0.018* | -0.290 | 0.024* | - | - |
All measures of cardiac oxygenation and LAD blood flow were linearly associated with change in MAP. Invasively derived measures were linearly associated with global OS-CMR response (%-OS-SIGlobal) except ΔMvO2.
The OS-CMR response of the LAD specific territory (%-OS-SILAD) was compared to MAP, QLAD and ΔDO2 only. r = within-subjects Pearson’s co-efficient.
*p<0.05.