. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Jul 16;45(4):700–711. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000611

Table 3.

Hierarchical Regression Analyses for Experiment 2

	R²	ΔR²	B	SEb	B
*Model 1: Age & Individual Cognitive Abilities*
Step 1:	.066	.066^*
Age (in months)			.035	.016	.256^*
Step 2A:	.080	.014
Age (in months)			.019	.022	.138
PPVT (raw score)			.010	.010	.167
Step 2B:	.089	.023
Age (in months)			.014	.022	.105
WJ-VAL (raw score)			.015	.011	.214
Step 2C:	.149	.083^*
Age (in months)			−.004	.021	−.028
WJ-PR (raw score)			.162	.062	.405^*
*Model 2: Age & All Cognitive Abilities*
Step 1:	.066	.066^*
Age (in months)			.035	.016	.256^*
Step 2:	.152	.086⁺
Age (in months)			−.009	.026	−.069
PPVT (raw score)			.001	.011	.008
WJ-VAL (raw score)			.006	.012	.082
WJ-PR (raw score)			.150	.073	.373^*
*Model 3: All Cognitive Abilities*
Step 1:	.150	.150^*
PPVT (raw score)			−.001	.010	−.017
WJ-VAL (raw score)			.004	.011	.056
WJ-PR (raw score)			.144	.072	.360^*

Note.

indicates p < .05 and + indicates .05 < p < .10.

Predictor variable in all models: Performance on CSWL task.