Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 10;9:1178. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01178

Table 1.

Demographics and neuropsychological testing.

aMCI-c (n = 26) aMCI-nc (n = 26) HC (n = 26) F value P-value
Age (years) 67.7 ± 8.1 (50–78) 67.7 ± 8.3 (50–78) 67.8 ± 8.0 (50–78) 0.01 0.99*
Gender(M/F) 12/14 14/12 13/13 0.86#
Education (years) 10.1 ± 5.0 (0–20) 9.4 ± 5.0 (0–18) 11.2 ± 5.4 (0–18) 0.63 0.54*
MMSE 23.1 ± 2.9 (17–28) 25.3 ± 3.5 (18–30) 28.0 ± 2.3 (20–30) 20.29 <0.001*abc
MoCA 17.6 ± 3.1 (10–23) 20.6 ± 4.0 (14–26) 26.5 ± 1.5 (25–30) 58.54 <0.001*abc
AVLT-Immediate Recall 4.8 ± 1.2 (2.7–7.3) 5.8 ± 1.7 (3.3–10.0) 9.3 ± 2.0 (2.7–14.7) 53.07 <0.001*bc
AVLT-Delayed Recall 2.7 ± 2.1 (0–6) 3.5 ± 3.1 (0–11) 10.1 ± 2.8 (4–15) 59.08 <0.001*bc
AVLT-Recognition 6.5 ± 3.9 (−3–13) 7.5 ± 3.7 (0–14) 12.2 ± 2.3 (5–15) 20.22 <0.001*bc

Values are represented as the mean ± SD (range). All of the scores are raw values.

HC, healthy control; aMCI, amnestic mild cognitive impairment; aMCI-c, aMCI converters; aMCI-nc, aMCI non-converters; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination (Chinese Version); MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Beijing Version); AVLT, Auditory Verbal Learning Test.

*

The P-values were obtained using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Post-hoc pairwise comparisons were performed using a t-test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

#

The P-values were obtained using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA.

a

post-hoc paired comparisons showed a significant group difference between aMCI-c vs. aMCI-nc.

b

post-hoc paired comparisons showed a significant group difference between aMCI-c vs. HC.

c

post-hoc paired comparisons showed a significant group difference between aMCI-nc vs. HC.