Table 4.

The impact of health or price being considered important, use of nutrition labels, and salt reduction advice, with salt reduction and swap outcomes^a.

	Beta (95% C.I)						Price important	p-value
	Health important	p-value	Advised to reduce salt	p-value	Use of nutrition labels	p-value
Salt reduction (g/100g) (n = 924)	−0.03 (−0.05, −0.02)	<0.001	−0.03 (−0.04, −0.01)	<0.001	−0.02 (−0.04, −0.01)	0.004	0.00 (−0.02, 0.02)	0.872
Proportion of swaps accepted (n = 923)	0.13 (0.10, 0.17)	<0.001	0.06 (0.03, 0.10)	<0.001	0.10 (0.06, 0.13)	<0.001	0.01 (−0.03, 0.05)	0.662
Average salt reduction per swap (g/100g) (n = 811)	0.01 (−0.03, 0.05)	0.579	−0.03 (−0.07, 0.00)	0.062	−0.01 (−0.05, 0.03)	0.628	0.00 (−0.04, 0.04)	0.883

^aBeta (95% CI) from linear regression models adjusted for intervention group. Each covariate (e.g. Health important) are modelled as dummy variables (yes vs no) in separate models with “no” being the comparator.