Table 2.

Results of the bottleneck analysis and effective population size for the 19 populations of Petrosia ficiformis

Pop.	ϴ	CI 95%	A	Ae	rA	Ho	He	FIS	HWE	Wilcoxon rank test
										(2t_SMM)	(2t_TPM)
SMI	0.003	0.0003–0.0048	30	1.938	2.567	0.383	0.403	0.089	**	0.426	0.820
FLO	0.020	0.0054–0.0228	24	1.532	2.123	0.307	0.341	0.156	**	0.301	0.570
MAD	0.085	0.0800–0.0953	38	2.322	3.019	0.393	0.48	0.217	***	0.160	0.922
CAN	0.050	0.036–0.0530	41	3.016	3.888	0.636	0.618	0.045	**	0.432	0.160
CAR	0.084	0.0710–0.0970	49	2.694	3.361	0.579	0.54	−0.052	ns	0.024	0.625
CART	0.092	0.0803–0.0980	47	2.707	4.347	0.586	0.581	0.068	ns	0.014	0.105
BLA	0.093	0.0884–0.0980	81	3.901	4.847	0.681	0.718	0.071	***	0.001	0.084
ULL	0.085	0.0800–0.0976	37	2.233	2.855	0.613	0.503	−0.191	**	0.625	0.625
FEL	0.036	0.0444–0.0601	51	3.262	3.997	0.658	0.624	−0.01	ns	0.625	0.625
ESC	0.003	0.0000–0.0150	40	2.732	3.552	0.627	0.56	−0.065	ns	1.000	0.625
MRS	0.036	0.0102–0.0174	50	2.62	3.922	0.489	0.56	0.173	***	0.003	0.010
NIZ	0.040	0.0438–0.0562	48	2.478	3.563	0.551	0.562	0.057	***	0.005	0.019
LIG	0.018	0.0002–0.0274	60	3.964	4.736	0.509	0.706	0.311	***	0.922	0.193
NAP	0.061	0.0498–0.0845	53	3.342	4.145	0.677	0.682	0.042	ns	0.625	0.032
SLO	0.090	0.0832–0.1000	41	2.919	3.567	0.7	0.633	−0.065	ns	0.322	0.014
SCRO	0.029	0.0060–0.0223	53	2.775	3.804	0.574	0.553	−0.001	ns	0.007	0.105
JECRO	0.096	0.0854–0.1000	55	2.96	4.181	0.548	0.617	0.151	***	0.001	0.084
CRE	0.007	0.0000–0.0133	48	2.822	3.926	0.627	0.556	−0.075	ns	0.014	0.131
ISR	0.007	0.0007–0.0133	77	4.276	4.97	0.778	0.738	−0.028	ns	0.010	1.000

Abbreviations: Pop population, ϴ, Theta; 25–75% confidence intervals for ϴ, Ns number of individuals, A number of alleles, Ae Number of effective alleles, rA number of alleles after rarefaction, Ho observed heterozygosity, He expected heterozygosity, F_IS inbreeding coefficient, HWE deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, ns not significant; * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.001; TPM, two-phase model; SMM, stepwise-mutation model