Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 16;19:25. doi: 10.1186/s12862-018-1322-y

Table 3.

Results of ANOVA analyses of effect of male category and body mass on male fertility

Response variable Explanatory variable df
numerator
df
denominator
F p-value
Cauda sperm Male category 2 25.19 1.12 0.34
Body mass 1 39.04 4.47 0.04
Testis mass Male category 4 74.75 210.29 < 10−15
Body mass 1 103.29 15.81 < 0.001
Epididymis mass Male category 4 72.16 63.10 < 10−15
Body mass 1 103.00 23.80 < 10−5
Seminal vesicle and coagulating gland Male category 4 73.13 2.63 0.04
Body mass 1 103.69 45.79 < 10−9
Preputial gland Male category 4 72.13 2.01 0.10
Body mass 1 93.78 22.93 < 10−5

Parent pair was used as a random effect to correct for the inclusion of siblings in the dataset. For all response variables except cauda sperm, male categories included the CHBU parental race, the CHHN parental race, F1 between CHBU and CHHN, offspring from backcrosses to CHHN with 2n = 23, and offspring from backcrosses to CHHN with 2n = 24. In the model for cauda sperm, only male categories with sperm were tested (CHBU, CHHN, and offspring from backcrosses to CHHN with 2n = 24, see text)