Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan;100(1):16–23. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0553

Table 4.

Current evidence for CCHFV circulation in Western Asia

Country CCHF cases reported Human serology Animal serology Hyalomma ticks Virus detected in Hyalomma ticks
Armenia 197445,95 197296 197296 Yes97 1972–197497,98
Azerbaijan No 200799 1967–1970100 Yes97 1972–197497,101
Bahrain No NA NA NA NA
Cyprus No NA NA Yes* NA
Georgia 2009–201742,68,102 201468,102105 NA Yes19 NA
Iraq 1979–1980, 1990–2010, 2013, 201562,63,106 1979–198063 1980107 Yes* NA
Israel No NA NA Yes* NA
Jordan No NA NA Yes* NA
Kuwait 1980, 198246 1979–1982108 NA Yes* NA
Lebanon No NA NA Yes* NA
Oman 1995–201779,109,110 2000†14 2000†14 Yes* 2000†14
Palestine No NA NA Yes* NA
Qatar No NA NA NA NA
Saudi Arabia 1990, 200983 200983,111,112 1995111 Yes* 1995113
Syria No NA 199614 Yes114 2014†11
Turkey 2002–20177,31 1974, 2012, 2016†115117 2011118 Yes* 2013–2015119
United Arab Emirates 1979, 1980, 1994–1995, 20106,80,82 1997†81 1997†81 Yes* 1997†81
Yemen No NA NA Yes120 NA

CCHF = Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever; CCHFV = Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus; NA = no information available. Years are listed if there is peer-reviewed evidence of anti-CCHFV antibodies in humans or animals, CCHFV vector endemicity, or CCHFV antigen or genome detection.

* United States National Tick Collection.

† Year represents time of publication rather than time of sample collection.Years are listed if there is peer-reviewed evidence of anti-CCHFV antibodies in humans or animals, CCHFV vector endemicity, or CCHFV antigen or genome detection.