Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 17;14(1):e0210000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210000

Fig 4. Regression results for GRF metrics vs. tibial bone load metrics across 30 running trials, for a single subject (Subject 1).

Fig 4

Each gray dot represents a single condition (i.e., a given speed and slope from Fig 2), and n indicates number of running conditions that exhibited a measurable GRF impact peak for Subject 1. The correlation coefficient (r) was computed for Subject 1 across all running speeds and slopes. Note that no single subject should be considered representative given the large inter-subject variability observed. For instance, the one strong correlation shown for this subject (r = 0.89) was as low as r = 0.16 for another subject. The correlation coefficients for each individual subject are reported in Table 1.