Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 7;8:e41741. doi: 10.7554/eLife.41741

Table 4. The output of Kriskal-Wallis ANOVA analysis of the results shown in Figure 3—figure supplement 9B.

X-Function Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA
Data filter No
Variant Data Range (number of cells)
WT [DataNa1PipNa]Sheet1!WT [1*:11*]
Q46A [DataNa1PipNa]Sheet1!Q46A [1*:6*]
K188A [DataNa1PipNa]Sheet1!K188A [1*:10*]
K188E [DataNa1PipNa]Sheet1!K188E [1*:6*]
R192E [DataNa1PipNa]Sheet1!R192E [1*:8*]
Q46AK188A [DataNa1PipNa]Sheet1!Q46AK188A [1*:7*]
K188AR192A [DataNa1PipNa]Sheet1!K188AR192A [1*:8*]
K188AR259Q [DataNa1PipNa]Sheet1!K188AR259Q [1*:10*]
Variant N Min Q1 Median Q3 Max
WT 11 −11 -9 -5 -3 0
Q46A 6 −11 −8.75 −2.5 −0.5 1
K188A 10 -9 −5.5 -4 -4 -2
K188E 6 −14 −12.5 −6.5 −3.75 -3
R192E 8 -7 −6.75 -5 −2.5 -2
Q46AK188A 7 -9 -9 -5 -3 1
K188AR192A 8 −16 −13.25 -4 −0.5 7
K188AR259Q 10 −15 −9.25 −7.5 -5 -3
Variant N Mean Rank Sum Rank
WT 11 34.13636 375.5
Q46A 6 43.33333 260
K188A 10 37 370
K188E 6 26.33333 158
R192E 8 36.75 294
Q46AK188A 7 35.5 248.5
K188AR192A 8 35.3125 282.5
K188AR259Q 10 22.25 222.5
Chi-Square DF Prob > Chi-Square
6.6454 7 0.46671

Null Hypothesis: The samples come from the same population.

Alternative Hypothesis: The samples come from different populations.

At the 0.05 level, the populations are NOT significantly different.