Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Dec 3;87(2):141–150. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000359

Table 3.

Model estimated effects of pre-specified contrasts predicting negative affect (NA)

Pre-specified simple effects estimates Cohen’s d ES
Contrasts Estimate SE DF t p-value
3-way interaction (CBT X Stressor X EMA day): 1.60 0.70 28 2.29 .03 0.37
CBT only:
Current vs no stressor, EMA day 2 vs EMA day 1 −1.18 0.55 28 −2.15 .04 0.34
 EMA day 1, current vs no stressor 4.15 0.27 28 15.65 <.001 2.51
 EMA day 2, current vs no stressor 2.97 0.48 28 6.18 <.001 0.99
Wait list only:
Current vs no stressor, EMA day 2 vs EMA day 1 0.42 0.44 28 0.97 .34 0.16
 EMA day 1, current vs no stressor 3.39 0.24 28 14.32 <.001 2.29
 EMA day 2, current vs no stressor 3.81 0.37 28 10.34 <.001 1.66
Additional contrasts
Current stressor at EMA day 2, treatment vs wait list −1.56 0.71 28 −2.23 .034 0.36