Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):e129–e135. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003541

Table 3.

Characteristics of Patients Identified by Each VPS Screening Algorithm

Population Characteristic Sepsis Registry (n=401) Explicit Codes (n=515) Martin Codes (n=970) Angus Codes (n=1387)
Prevalence of Severe Sepsis / Septic Shocka 5.4% 6.9% 13.0% 18.6%
Age in years, median (IQR) 7 (2–14) 7 (2–14) 7 (2–14) 5 (1–12)
Admitted from inpatient unit, n (%) 99 (25) 140 (27) 275 (28) 375 (27)
PIM-2 risk of mortality, median (IQR) 2.9 (1.0–4.7) 1.8 (1.0–4.9) 1.3 (0.9–4.4) 2.8 (0.9–4.2)
PRISM-III score, median (IQR) 8 (4–14) 8 (3–14) 5 (2–11) 3 (0–9)
Oncologic diagnosis, n (%) 73 (18) 99 (19) 156 (16) 128 (9)
Conventional mechanical ventilation, n (%) 258 (64) 301 (58) 482 (50) 826 (59)
Advanced mode of ventilationb, n (%) 72 (18) 83 (16) 97 (10) 127 (9)
Extracorporeal support, n (%) 12 (3) 14 (3) 14 (1) 18 (1)
PICU LOS in days, median (IQR) 9 (3–19) 7 (2–17) 5 (2–13) 6 (2–13)
PICU mortality, n (%) 34 (8) 46 (8) 60 (6) 64 (4)
a

Prevalence for each method is calculated as number of patients identified divided by number of patients screened (n=7459).

b

Advanced modes of ventilation include high frequency oscillatory ventilation, volume diffusive respirator, and airway pressure release ventilation.

Abbreviations:

IQR = interquartile range; PIM = paediatric index of mortality; PRISM = pediatric risk of mortality; PICU = pediatric intensive care unit; LOS = length of stay