Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):e129–e135. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003541

Table 4.

Detailed analysis of characteristics of sepsis episodes identified in the VPS explicit codes cohort, the reference standard cohort, or both.

Patient characteristicsaracteristic Both Cohorts Sepsis Registry (+) VPS Search (+) (n=292) Reference Cohort Only Sepsis Registry (+) VPS Search (–) (n=109) VPS Cohort Only Sepsis Registry (–) VPS Search (+) (n=223) pa
Age in years, median (IQR) 8 (2–14) 4 (1–13) 7 (2–14) 0.073
Admitted from inpatient unit, n (%) 72 (25) 27 (25) 68 (30) 0.292
PIM-2 risk of mortality, median (IQR) 3.1 (1.1–5.0) 2.0 (0.9–4.2) 1.4 (1.0–4.5) 0.034*
PRISM-III score, median (IQR) 9 (5–15) 7 (3–13) 7 (3–12) 0.013*
Oncologic diagnosis, n (%) 59 (20) 14 (13) 40 (18) 0.247
Conventional mechanical ventilation, n (%) 187 (64) 71 (65) 114 (51) 0.005*
Advanced modes of ventilationb, n (%) 55 (19) 17 (16) 28 (13) 0.155
Extracorporeal support, n (%) 10 (3) 2 (2) 4 (2) 0.443
PICU LOS in days among survivors, median (IQR) 9 (4–19) 7 (3–19) 4 (2–11) <0.001*
PICU mortality, n (%) 28 (10) 6 (6) 18 (8) 0.414
a

Comparisons across all three groups assessed by Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and Chi-squared test for categorical variables.

b

Advanced modes of ventilation include high frequency oscillatory ventilation, volume diffusive respirator, and airway pressure release ventilation.

*

Significance at the α = 0.05 level

Abbreviations:

PIM = pediatric index of mortality; PRISM = pediatric risk of mortality; PICU = pediatric intensive care unit; LOS = length of stay