Table 2.
Place of Study | Cases and Controls | 25(OH)D Level at Diagnosis | Vitamin D Deficiency | Significant Findings | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sweden | Age: 15–34 y Cases: 459 Controls: 208 |
Cases: 82.5 ± 1.3 nmol/L ♂: 77.9 ± 1.4; ♀: 90.1 ± 2.4 nmol/L Controls: 96.7 ± 2.0 nmol/L |
Significantly lower 25(OH)D level in cases than in controls. Significantly lower 25(OH)D in diabetic men than women. | [119] | |
Australia | Age: pediatric Cases: 56 Controls: 46 |
Cases: 78.7 (71.8–85.6) nmol/L Controls: 91.4 (83.5–98.7) nmol/L |
Significantly lower 25(OH)D level in cases than in controls. | [120] | |
India | Age: <25 y Cases: 72 Controls: 41 |
Cases: 7.88 ± 1.2 ng/mL Controls: 16.64 ± 7.83 ng/mL |
Cases: 91.1% Controls: 58.5% |
Significantly lower 25(OH)D level and higher prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in cases than in controls. | [121] |
Italy | Age: pediatric Cases: 82 Controls: 117 |
Cases: 54.4 ± 27.3 nmol/L Controls: 74.1 ± 28.5 nmol/L |
Cases: 48.8% Controls: 17.9% |
Significantly lower 25(OH)D level and higher prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in cases than in controls. | [122] |
Qatar | Age: <16 y Cases: 170 Controls: 170 |
Cases: 90.6% Controls: 85.3% |
Significantly higher prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in cases than in controls. | [123] | |
Kuwait | Age: pediatric Cases: 216 Controls: 204 |
Cases: total 99% Deficiency: 84% Insufficiency: 15% Controls: total 92% Deficiency: 77% Insufficiency: 15% |
Significantly higher prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and vitamin D (deficiency + insufficiency) in cases than in controls. | [124] | |
Finland | Age: pediatric Cases: 35 Controls: 80 |
Cases (β-cell Aab+): 70.6 ± 20.8 nmol/L Controls (β-cell Aab−): 65.7 ± 19.4 nmol/L |
No significant difference in 25(OH)D level in cases and controls. | [126] |
♂—males; ♀—females; Aab+: autoantibodies-positive; Aab−: autoantibodies-negative.