Table 4.

Pairwise comparison between BC, L⁻¹ and RMSF⁻¹ (100 ns and last 15 ns time frames) using Pearson’s correlation coefficient, apo run1, (ii).

Protein	L vs. RMSF (100 ns)	L vs. RMSF (last 15 ns)	L−1 vs. BC	RMSF−1 (100 ns) vs. BC	RMSF−1 (last 15 ns) vs. BC
Hsp72 apo Run1	0.53	0.45	0.39	0.12	0.10
Hsp72 apo Run2	0.57	0.53	0.39	0.07	0.11
Hsp72-SANC00132 Run1	0.43	0.77	0.51	0.15	0.37
Hsp72-SANC00132 Run2	0.64	0.74	0.49	0.12	0.27
Hsp72 endo-apo Run1	0.56	0.80	0.45	0.19	0.30
Hsp72 endo-apoRun2	0.61	0.78	0.45	0.24	0.28
Hsp72 endo-complex Run1	0.69	0.38	0.43	0.23	0.03
Hsp72 endo-complex Run2	0.58	0.68	0.48	0.16	0.28
Hsc70 apo Run1	0.58	0.87	0.49	0.10	0.37
Hsc70 apo Run2	0.62	0.72	0.48	0.15	0.13
Hsc70-SANC00132 Run1	0.74	0.77	0.40	0.32	0.30
Hsc70-SANC00132 Run2	0.70	0.72	0.40	0.09	0.32
Hsc70 endo-apo Run1	0.59	0.72	0.46	0.12	0.30
Hsc70 endo-apo Run2	0.76	0.80	0.42	0.25	0.28
Hsc70 endo-complex Run1	0.60	0.77	0.43	0.15	0.22
Hsc70 endo-complex Run2	0.51	0.58	0.45	0.04	0.30