Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 20;20(1):13. doi: 10.3390/ijms20010013

Table 3.

Prognostic and predictive role of MSI-H phenotype in gastric cancer.

Author Histology Stage Number of MSI-H Patients MSI-H Frequency Prognostic Role of MSI-H Phenotype Prognostic/Predictive Value Reference
Kim H et al. adenocarcinoma all stages 161 9% better improved prognosis [61]
An JY et al. adenocarcinoma all stages 170 8.5% no impact no benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in MSI-H patients [62]
Fang WL et al. adenocarcinoma I–III 25 11.7% better improved 5-year OS (68% vs. 47.6%, p = 0.030), trend towards better DFS at 3 years [63]
Beghelli S et al. adenocarcinoma all stages 83 16% better improved survival in stage II patients [64]
Kim SY et al. adenocarcinoma II–III 105 8.2% better improved prognosis without chemotherapy [65]
Smyth EC et al. adenocarcinoma localized 20 8.5% better worse prognosis when treated with chemotherapy [59]
Polom K et al. adenocarcinoma metastatic 14 8.0% better improved OS (15.9 vs. 8 months, p = 0.023) [56]
Giampieri R et al. adenocarcinoma metastatic 15 14% better improved overall survival [66]
Corso G et al. adenocarcinoma all stages 63 25.2% better improved long term survival [57]
Oki E et al. adenocarcinoma all stages 22 9.4% No prognostic role No prognostic role [67]
Falchetti M et al. adenocarcinoma localized 27 17% better improved survival (p = 0.1) [68]
Marrelli D et al. adenocarcinoma all stages 111 23.5% better improved 5-year survival (67.6% vs. 35%, p < 0.001) [69]