Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 19;133(2):137–146. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-04-848044

Table 2.

Cox regression analysis for time to HBV reactivation (analysis population, n = 326)

Effect/covariate* Time to HBV reactivation (univariate) Time to HBV reactivation (multivariate)
Crude HR 95% CI P Adjusted HR 95% CI P
Age at baseline (continuous, by 10 y) 1.24 0.90-1.79 .2260 1.63 1.00-2.37 .0351
Sex (male vs female) 1.51 0.68-3.37 .3110 1.19 0.50-2.86 .6923
ECOG performance status at baseline (2 vs 0 or 1) 1.04 0.25-4.42 .9531 NA NA NA
Lymphoma type (DLBCL [GOYA] vs non-DLBCL [GALLIUM]) 3.06 1.04-9.04 .0430 3.76 1.09-12.96 .0356
IPI, FLIPI score (high-intermediate/high vs low/intermediate/low-intermediate) 1.51 0.71-3.21 .2877 NA NA NA
Anti-HBs at baseline (negative vs positive) 4.35 1.93-9.78 .0004 4.00 1.71-9.37 .0014
HBV DNA level at baseline, IU/mL (detectable vs not detectable) 12.42 4.96-31.07 <.0001 18.22 6.04-54.93 <.0001
Prophylactic NAT (yes vs no) 0.19 0.04-0.79 .0226 0.09 0.02-0.41 .0018
Antibody treatment group (G-Chemo vs R-Chemo) 1.94 0.89-4.24 .0963 1.79 0.78-4.16 .1748
Chemotherapy group§ (CHOP vs non-CHOP) 1.86 0.44-7.94 .3990 NA NA NA

NA, not applicable.

*

Reference groups for each factor are shown in bold. Race/ethnicity was not included in the model.

Factors with P < .2 by univariate analysis, baseline age, and sex were included in the multivariate analysis; 95% Wald confidence interval and P value for Wald test.

Includes DLBCL patients from GOYA and non-DLBCL patients from GALLIUM.

§

Includes patients from both GOYA and GALLIUM.