Table 4.
Multivariable logistic regression Model 4.
| Model 4a |
Model 4b |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | aOR | 95% CI | p | aOR | 95% CI | p |
| Participant characteristics | ||||||
| Age | 0.84 | 0.75–0.96 | 0.007 | 0.87 | 0.77–1.00 | 0.05 |
| Gender | ||||||
| Men | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Women | 0.56 | 0.35–0.90 | 0.017 | 0.76 | 0.49–1.30 | 0.367 |
| Region | ||||||
| Macao | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Hong Kong | 0.91 | 0.24–3.39 | 0.887 | 0.90 | 0.22–3.53 | 0.859 |
| Mainland China | 0.33 | 0.17–0.64 | 0.001 | 0.40 | 0.21–0.84 | 0.014 |
| Taiwan | 0.43 | 0.05–3.57 | 0.433 | 0.56 | 0.07–4.97 | 0.639 |
| Direct exposure experience | ||||||
| Injured | 0.45 | 0.11–1.85 | 0.267 | 0.40 | 0.10–1.62 | 0.200 |
| Witnessed people injured | 2.12 | 1.21–3.70 | 0.008 | 2.32 | 1.36–4.00 | 0.002 |
| Someone close being injured | 1.55 | 0.63–3.82 | 0.342 | 1.48 | 0.60–3.63 | 0.395 |
| Almost drowned in the flooding | 8.24 | 1.82–37.34 | 0.006 | 8.99 | 1.92–41.99 | 0.005 |
| Saw someone almost drown | 0.61 | 0.19–1.92 | 0.399 | 0.65 | 0.20–2.14 | 0.481 |
| Saw someone drown | 1.45 | 0.27–7.65 | 0.661 | 1.68 | 0.30–9.39 | 0.554 |
| Saw a dead body | 0.99 | 0.14–7.15 | 0.990 | 0.89 | 0.11–7.07 | 0.913 |
| Home damaged | 3.04 | 1.79–5.17 | < 0.001 | 2.86 | 1.71–4.78 | < 0.001 |
| Home flooded | 1.18 | 0.65–2.13 | 0.592 | 1.27 | 0.70–2.27 | 0.431 |
| Home uninhabitable after the typhoon | 2.52 | 1.40–4.54 | 0.002 | 2.59 | 0.44–4.64 | 0.001 |
| Personal or family loss of property | 0.74 | 0.43–1.26 | 0.264 | 0.74 | 0.44–1.25 | 0.263 |
| Resource deprivation | ||||||
| No access to drinking water | 1.28 | 0.73–2.21 | 0.387 | 1.25 | 0.72–2.15 | 0.430 |
| No access to food | 1.43 | 0.86–2.36 | 0.166 | 1.48 | 0.90–2.44 | 0.121 |
| No access to electricity | 0.35 | 0.12–0.97 | 0.043 | 0.45 | 0.17–1.24 | 0.123 |
| No access to internet | 0.74 | 0.33–1.65 | 0.458 | 0.70 | 0.31–1.54 | 0.363 |
| No access to needed medication | 3.42 | 1.33–8.80 | 0.011 | 3.61 | 1.45–9.01 | 0.006 |
| No access to medical attention | 1.67 | 0.58–4.77 | 0.339 | 1.32 | 0.47–3.70 | 0.597 |
| Types of media use | ||||||
| Watching TV | 0.99 | 0.88–1.10 | 0.82 | |||
| Listening to radio programmes | 1.20 | 1.08–1.33 | 0.001 | |||
| Reading newspaper | 0.92 | 0.82–1.03 | 0.14 | |||
| Watching videos | 1.00 | 0.90–1.12 | 0.95 | |||
| Viewing news updates on social media | 0.93 | 0.82–1.05 | 0.25 | |||
| Viewing videos on social media that were captured by people in the community | 1.11 | 0.98–1.27 | 0.09 | |||
| Sharing posts on social media | 1.75 | 1.09–2.81 | 0.02 | |||
| Media content | ||||||
| The storm itself | 0.37 | 0.28–0.49 | < 0.001 | |||
| The flooding | 1.00 | 0.74–1.33 | 0.98 | |||
| Drowning victims | 1.29 | 1.00–1.67 | 0.05 | |||
| Residents’ emotional reaction | 1.98 | 1.44–2.72 | < 0.001 | |||
| Interviews with government | 1.21 | 0.97–1.54 | 0.09 | |||
| Images of people being heroic | 0.72 | 0.55–0.94 | 0.02 | |||
aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.