Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 18;9:211. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36285-4

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Two-dimensional superconducting strip of width W = 64ξ with non-homogeneous inclusion distribution. The current J is applied vertically (along the x-axis), the magnetic field B is perpendicular to the figure plane, and the resulting Lorentz force FL acts to the right (along the y-axis). The sample has a length of L = 1024ξ with quasi-periodic boundary conditions in the x direction; in the y direction, we have open boundary conditions, i.e., superconductor-vacuum surfaces. The strip contains (uncorrelated) randomly placed circular inclusions of diameter d = 3ξ. The density of these inclusions depends on y: in the middle of the sample, the volume fraction occupied by inclusions is f = 0.2, which corresponds approximately to conditions for the maximum possible critical current density in bulk samples. The density of the inclusion ρi(y) decreases linearly near the sample boundaries (see bottom plot): within a region of width lin at the boundary where vortices enter the sample and lout at the boundary where vortices leave the sample. (b) The critical current Jc as a function of lin and lout normalized by Jc(0, 0) at applied magnetic field B = 0.1Hc2. The critical current is increased by ~30% for finite lin and lout compared to the critical current from a homogeneous defect distribution (lin = lout = 0). The values of lin and lout corresponding to the maximum of the critical current Jc(lin, lout) are shown by colored circles for B = 0.1Hc2, 0.2Hc2, and 0.3Hc2. The effect is asymmetric and depends on the direction of vortex motion. The maximum is indicated by a (blue) circle. Corresponding maxima for fields 0.2Hc2 and 0.3Hc2 are indicated by (cyan and green) circles, marked by the field value.