Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 20;16(1):11. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010011

Table 7.

Accuracy of diagnostic tools for strongyloidiasis at different pre-test prevalence levels, 2012–February 2017.

Index tests True-Positives
Pre-Test Probability a
False-Positives
Pre-Test Probability a
True-Negatives
Pre-Test Probability a
False-Negatives
Pre-Test Probability a
% Infected Correctly Diagnosed
Test % Prevalence b 2.5% 10% 30% 2.5% 10% 30% 2.5% 10% 30% 2.5% 10% 30%
Baermann method [51] 18 72 216 0 0 0 975 900 700 7 28 84 72%
Agar plate [51] 22 89 267 0 0 0 975 900 700 3 11 33 89%
NIE-LIPS [62] 21 85 255 49 45 35 926 855 665 4 15 45 85.1%
IVD-ELISA (commercial test) [62] 23 92 276 29 27 21 946 873 679 2 8 24 92%
IFAT [62] 23 94 282 127 117 91 848 783 609 2 6 18 93.8%
Bordier-ELISA (commercial kit) [62] 23 91 272 58 54 42 917 846 658 2 9 28 90.7%
SS-NIE-1 ELISA [63] 24 95 285 68 63 49 907 837 651 1 5 15 95%
ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; IFAT: indirect fluorescent antibody technique; IVD: Invitro diagnostic test; LIPS: luciferase immunoprecipitation system; NIE: 31-kDa recombinant antigen from St. stercoralis.
  • a 
    Data reported as effect per 1000 migrants tested.
  • b 
    pre-test prevalence or probability of having schistosomiasis in an at-risk population.