Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 19.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2018 Sep 25;23(1):102–116. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.09.007

Table 5. Correlation of language functioning and language lateralization with demographic and clinical data, and difference by gender.

Age at stroke Time between stroke and study modASPECTS at stroke presentation Residual lesion volume at study Age at study Difference by gender
Patients Controls Patients Controls
r p r p r p r p r p r p U p U p






Language functioning
naming 0.31 0.222 -0.11 0.676 0.03 0.911 -0.03 0.888 0.28 0.269 0.24 0.345 12 0.064 17 0.044
comprehension 0.25 0.323 0.04 0.885 -0.42 0.093 -0.29 0.260 0.24 0.363 0.29 0.241 19 0.279 23 0.151
reading 0.16 0.548 0.19 0.471 -0.38 0.137 0.02 0.933 0.41 0.103 -0.04 0.880 24 0.574 27 0.328
writing 0.55 0.023 0.11 0.688 -0.19 0.463 -0.25 0.327 0.73 0.001 0.32 0.201 19 0.279 8 0.004
word fluency 0.15 0.558 0.04 0.869 -0.14 0.581 -0.16 0.533 0.36 0.162 -0.09 0.732 10 0.037 25 0.246
verbal memory 0.26 0.319 -0.09 0.722 -0.38 0.137 -0.26 0.314 0.22 0.395 0.29 0.239 16 0.160 22 0.151
Language lateralization
LI 0.23 0.371 -0.12 0.653 0.17 0.505 0.00 0.996 0.28 0.275 -0.36 0.143 16 0.130 38 0.930

Note: Significance after Bonferroni correction is indicated with bold letters.

Abbreviation: LI = Language Laterality Index; modASPECTS = Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score