Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 5;3(1):45–55. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10067

Table 1.

Characteristics of Studies Evaluating the Risk of Fracture in Kidney Transplant According to the Design and Comparator Group

First author, year of publication, and study country Sample size White (%) Age, years (mean) Female (%) Mean follow‐up (years) Mean follow‐up post fracture (years) Hip fracture Vertebral fracture Overall fracture Risk of bias
Cross‐sectional study, kidney transplant versus no comparator
Braga 2006, Brazil24 191 NR 44.8 50.8 NR NA Critical
Durieux 2002, France25 59 71.0 49.6 45.8 8.5 NA Critical
Patel 2001, United Kingdom26 165 90.0 47.0 42.4 NR NA Critical
Nam 2000, Korea27 166 NR 40.0 34.3 NR NA Critical
Nisbeth 1999, Sweden28 193 NR 50.9 39.9 NR NA Critical
Grotz 1994, Germany29 100 NR 44.0 46.0 NR NA Critical
Retrospective cohort study, kidney transplant versus no comparator
Ferro 2015, United Kingdom30 21,769 71.1 NR 38.7 5.7 NR Critical
Nair 2014, United States18 69,740 56.9 50.5 39.0 2.2 1 b Moderate
Nikkel 2012, United States31 77,430 65.8 48.8 39.7 3.9 NA Critical
Opelz 2011, multinational32 20,509 86.9 47.9 38.4 5.0b NA Critical
Nikkel 2009, United States33 68,814 73.8 43.7 39.7 5.0b NR Critical
O'Shaughnessy 2002, United States34 1572 NR NR 41.2 6.5 NR Critical
Prospective cohort study, kidney transplant versus no comparator
Ramsey‐Goldman 1999, United States35 432 54.0 41.3 40.0 2.1 NA Critical
Elmstedt 1981, Sweden36 204 NR NR 42.7 6.2 NA Critical
Retrospective cohort study, kidney transplant versus general population
Naylor 2016, a Canada37 4821 NR 49.3 36.9 2.9 NR Moderate
Vautour 2004, United States38 86 92.0 38.3 31.4 10.6 NR Serious
Abbot 2001, United States39 33,479 75.6 42.9 39.8 1.7 NR Moderate
Retrospective cohort study, kidney transplant versus dialysis
Ball 2002, United States19 101,039 63.20 40.6 40.60 3.0 NR Moderate

NR = Not Reported; NA = Not Applicable; √ = This type of fracture risk was assessed in the study.

a

Also compared fracture risk in KT to non‐dialysis CKD.

b

Total follow‐up time.