Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Urol. 2018 Sep 17;75(2):221–228. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.039

Table 3 –

Univariate logistic and linear regression analyses estimating the association between year of surgery and outcomes

Variable OR 95% CI p value
Outcome
    EF recovery at 12 mo 0.94 0.90–0.99 0.01
    EF recovery at 24 mo 0.93 0.88–0.98 0.01
    Use of PDE5is at 12 mo 1.02 0.97–1.06 0.5
    Use of PDE5is at 24 mo 0.90 0.83–0.97 0.008
Baseline characteristics
    CCI score (0 vs >=1) 1.08 1.02–1.15 0.008
    ORP 0.87 0.82–0.91 <0.0001
    LRP 0.81 0.77–0.85 <0.0001
    RARP 1.33 1.27–1.40 <0.0001
Coefficient
    Baseline IIEF-6 score –0.35 –0.54 to –0.16 0.0003
    Age 0.45 0.29–0.61 <0.0001

CI = confidence interval; CCI = Charlson comorbidity index; EF = erectile function; IIEF = International Index of Erectile Function; IQR = interquartile range; LRP = laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; OR = odds ratio; ORP = open radical prostatectomy; PCa = prostate cancer; PDE5is = phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors; RARP = robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.