Table 4 –

Multivariable logistic regression analyses testing predictors of erectile function recovery at 12 and 24 mo from radical prostatectomy

	EF recovery at 12 mo			EF recovery at 24 mo
	OR	95% CI	p value	OR	95% CI	p value
Year of surgery	0.98	0.92–1.04	0.4	0.99	0.93–1.07	0.9
Baseline IIEF-6	1.16	1.13–1.20	<0.0001	1.14	1.10–1.17	<0.0001
Age	0.95	0.93–0.97	<0.0001	0.94	0.92–0.96	<0.0001
Surgical approach
ORP vs LRP	0.75	0.54–1.04	0.08	0.76	0.51–1.11	0.2
ORP vs RARP	1.11	0.83–1.48	0.5	1.06	0.75–1.48	0.8
CCI score	0.71	0.59–0.86	0.001	0.78	0.64–0.96	0.02
Use of PDE5is	1.05	0.93–1.19	0.4	1.17	0.97–1.40	0.1
Urinary function a	1.43	1.08–1.89	0.01	1.66	1.16–2.39	0.006
pT stage
pT2 vs ≥ pT3	0.95	0.73–1.25	0.7	0.87	0.63–1.21	0.4
Gleason grade group
1 vs 2	0.92	0.67–1.27	0.6	0.73	0.49–1.09	0.1
1 vs 3	0.85	0.55–1.29	0.4	0.60	0.36–1.01	0.052
1 vs 4	0.82	0.37–1.82	0.6	0.77	0.29–2.03	0.6
1 vs 5	0.65	0.25–1.68	0.4	0.52	0.16–1.72	0.3

CI = confidence interval; CCI = Charlson comorbidity index; EF = erectile function; IIEF = International Index of Erectile Function; LRP = laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; OR = odds ratio; ORP = open radical prostatectomy; PDE5is= phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors; RARP = robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

^aUrinary function status at the time of erectile function assessment.