Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 1;25(1):5–13. doi: 10.5152/dir.2018.18013

Table 2.

Results of qualitative MRI analysis of the tumors

Oncocytoma Chromophobe RCC P
Mean tumor diameter (mm) 60.6±47.3 61.7±45.9 0.93a
Central scars, n (%) 9 (52.9) 11 (33.3) 0.18b
Mean scar diameter (mm) 39.2±36.9 25. 4±12.1 0.31c
Scar intensities* Hyperintense: 9 (100)
Hypointense: 0 (0)
Hyperintense: 9 (81.8)
Hypointense: 2 (18.2)
0.14b
RENAL scores 7.7±1.7 8.2±2.3 0.39c
Tumor growth pattern Exophytic: 15 (88.2)
Endophytic: 2 (11.8)
Exophytic: 27 (81.8)
Endophytic: 6 (18.2)
0.55b
Tumor signal homogeneity* Homogeneous: 2 (11.8)
Heterogeneous: 15 (88.2)
Homogeneous: 12 (36.4)
Heterogeneous: 21 (63.6)
0.065b
Tumor T2 signal intensity compared to renal parenchyma** Hyperintense: 7 (41.2)
Hypo/isointense: 10 (58.8)
Hyperintense: 3 (9.1)
Hypo/isointense: 30 (90.9)
0.007b

RCC, renal cell carcinoma; RENAL, Radius, Exophytic/endophytic properties, Nearness of tumor to the collecting system or sinus in millimeters, Anterior/posterior, Location relative to polar lines.

*

Both T2-weighted images (fast spin-echo and fat saturated T2-weighted images).

**

Fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.

a

Student t test;

b

Chi-square test;

c

Mann-Whitney U test.