Table 3. The cross-sectional association between diet quality, food groups and hearing thresholds - model 3.
All frequencies | Low frequencies | High frequencies | |
Difference (CI 95%) | Difference (CI 95%) | Difference (CI 95%) | |
Diet quality | -0.09 (-0.34, 0.15) | -0.16 (-0.36, 0.05) | -0.05 (-0.40, 0.31) |
Vegetables | -0.01 (-0.04, 0.01) | -0.02 (-0.04, 0.01) | -0.01 (-0.05, 0.03) |
Fruit | -0.01 (-0.02, 0.01) | -0.00 (-0.02, 0.01) | -0.01 (-0.03, 0.01) |
Whole grain products | -0.00 (-0.06, 0.06) | -0.03 (-0.08, 0.02) | 0.03 (-0.06, 0.12) |
Whole grains/total grains ratio | 0.00 (-0.05, 0.06) | 0.00 (-0.05, 0.05) | 0.02 (-0.07, 0.10) |
Legumes | 6.93 (-2.72, 16.58) | 8.04 (-0.00, 16.07) | 4.51 (-9.46, 18.49) |
Nuts | -0.01 (-0.31, 0.28) | -0.02 (-0.25, 0.22) | 0.01 (-0.20, 0.22) |
Dairy | 0.00 (-0.01, 0.02) | -0.01 (-0.02, 0.01) | 0.01 (-0.01, 0.04) |
Fish | -0.06 (-0.26, 0.14) | -0.10 (-0.26, 0.07) | -0.06 (-0.35, 0.23) |
Tea | -0.01 (-0.03, 0.01) | -0.01 (-0.02, 0.01) | -0.02 (-0.05, 0.01) |
Unsaturated fats/total fats ratio | 0.13 (-0.02, 0.29) | 0.16 (0.03, 0.29) | 0.13 (-0.09, 0.36) |
Salt | 0.00 (-0.00, 0.00) | -0.00 (-0.01, 0.00) | 0.00 (-0.01, 0.01) |
Alcohol | -0.07 (-0.36, 0.22) | -0.06 (-0.30, 0.19) | -0.09 (-0.52, 0.33) |
Red and processed meat | 0.04 (-0.06, 0.12) | 0.05 (-0.02, 0.13) | 0.01 (-0.13, 0.15) |
Sugar containing beverages | -0.02 (-0.06, 0.01) | -0.04 (-0.07, -0.01) | -0.04 (-0.08, 0.00) |
All frequencies (0.25, 0.50, 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz); low frequencies (0.25, 0.50, and 1 kHz); high frequencies (2, 4, and 8 kHz). Difference represents difference in dB per 1 point increase in diet quality score on a scale ranging from 0 to 14 or a 10 gram increase for the individual food components. CI: confidence interval. Adjusted for sex, age, age2, education, physical activity, smoking (former and current), alcohol intake, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, prevalent diabetes mellitus, total brain volume, energy intake and BMI (model 3). We did not adjust for alcohol intake in grams in the assessment of alcohol with hearing thresholds. Significant effect estimates (p<0.05) are indicated in bold.