Table 1.
Participant characteristics and associations with demographic and socioeconomic indicators
| Feel loved summary score |
Feel loved VAS |
Love yourself VAS |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | Mean (SD) | p value* | Mean (SD) | p value* | Mean (SD) | p value* | ||||
| Gender | Female | 312 | 76% | 351 (61) | 0.004 | 83 (21) | 0.009 | 75 (21) | 0.06 | ||
| Male | 100 | 24% | 332 (77) | 78 (21) | 70 (23) | ||||||
| Ethnicity | Hispanic | 24 | 6% | 370 (32) | 0.030 | 88 (14) | 0.12 | 82 (20) | 0.048 | ||
| Non-Hispanic | 377 | 94% | 344 (67) | 81 (21) | 74 (22) | ||||||
| Race | White/Caucasian | 348 | 85% | 345 (65) | 0.008 | 81 (21) | 0.47 | 73 (22) | <0.001 | ||
| Non-Caucasian | 52 | 13% | 358 (67) | 82 (22) | 85 (19) | ||||||
| More than one race | 11 | 3% | 328 (76) | 80 (22) | 65 (27) | ||||||
| Education | Some college | 97 | 24% | 352 (68) | 0.010 | 84 (21) | 0.020 | 78 (22) | 0.010 | ||
| College graduate | 315 | 76% | 344 (64) | 81 (21) | 73 (22) | ||||||
| Household Income | $0-$50,000 | 157 | 39% | 339 (73) | 0.52 | 79 (23) | 0.035 | 74 (24) | 0.41 | ||
| >$50,000 | 247 | 61% | 352 (57) | 84 (19) | 74 (20) | ||||||
|
IQR (25th-75th) |
Feel loved summary score |
Feel loved VAS |
Love yourself VAS |
||||||||
| n | Mean | SD | 25th | 75th | ρ** | p value | ρ** | p value | ρ** | p value | |
| Age (yrs) | 412 | 49.6 | 11.6 | 39.0 | 59.0 | 0.06 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 0.88 | 0.10 | 0.038 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 412 | 29.4 | 7.2 | 24.1 | 32.7 | 0.01 | 0.82 | 0.03 | 0.53 | 0.01 | 0.77 |
| Hourly Income ($) | 324 | 26.34 | 15.51 | 16.2 | 32.1 | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0.87 |
*
Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test
**
Spearman Rho correlations;
Results of categorical comparisons bolded when p value < 0.01 VAS = 100 mm visual analog scale; SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range (25th percentile to 75th percentile); BMI, body mass index