Figure 2.

Results of logistic mixed-effects regression with only untrained items in the model to examine generalization. For the full sample (a) and the responders (b), the likelihood of naming untrained typical items accurately (thin dotted line) was significantly greater than the likelihood of naming untrained atypical items (thick black line), supporting the CATE hypothesis and typicality effect. For nonresponders, there was no significant difference in the likelihood of naming untrained typical items versus untrained atypical items.