Table 1:
TREATMENT GROUP | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ID | Age | MPO | WAR AQ |
CLQT CS |
Type | AOS | BL Nam. |
T1 ES |
T2 ES |
Tx Resp. |
G1 ES |
G2 ES |
Avg. Trained |
Avg. Untrained |
||
Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |||||||||||||
BU01 | 55 | 12 | 87 | 90 | A | AB | 58.3 | 3 | 20.2*** | R | 4 | 9 | 39 | 94 | 55 | 86 |
BU02 | 50 | 29 | 25 | 50 | G | UN | 1 | 0 | 0 | NR | 0 | −0.6 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
BU03 | 63 | 62 | 52 | 55 | C | PR | 18 | 10** | 9** | R | 0 | 1 | 14 | 44 | 18 | 20 |
BU04 | 79 | 13 | 74 | 80 | C | AB | 68 | 4* | 13*** | R | 1 | 1 | 50 | 100 | 77 | 83 |
BU05 | 67 | 10 | 31 | 50 | W | AB | 6 | −1 | −2 | NR | −1 | −1 | 10 | 4 | 7 | 1 |
BU06 | 49 | 113 | 67 | 80 | B | PR | 56 | 3 | 9** | R | 1 | 0 | 56 | 90 | 72 | 73 |
BU07 | 55 | 137 | 48 | 60 | B | AB | 14 | 2 | 6* | R | 1 | 1 | 25 | 44 | 13 | 19 |
BU08 | 49 | 57 | 83 | 100 | A | PR | 69 | 3 | 4* | R | 1 | 1 | 72 | 100 | 65 | 70 |
BU09 | 71 | 37 | 95 | 95 | A | AB | 59 | 7** | 11*** | R | −1 | 1 | 41 | 87 | 51 | 45 |
BU10 | 53 | 12 | 80 | 80 | A | AB | 65 | 17*** | 3 | R | 7 | 4 | 60 | 93 | 62 | 82 |
BU11 | 78 | 22 | 92 | 75 | A | AB | 34 | 1 | 3 | NR | 1 | 1 | 38 | 57 | 22 | 29 |
BU12 | 68 | 104 | 40 | 60 | B | PR | 3 | 1 | 1 | NR | 1 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 6 | 8 |
BU13 | 42 | 18 | 93 | 95 | A | AB | 57 | 7* | 15.0*** | R | 2 | 3 | 47 | 99 | 47 | 70 |
BU14 | 64 | 24 | 64 | 80 | B | AB | 41 | 8** | 9** | R | 6 | 10 | 35 | 85 | 40 | 71 |
BU15 | 71 | 74 | 87 | 60 | A | AB | 57 | 6* | 1 | R | 2 | 1.1 | 44 | 60 | 38 | 52 |
BU16 | 50 | 71 | 34 | 70 | B | UN | 5 | 2 | 2 | NR | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 5 |
BU17 | 61 | 152 | 74 | 90 | A | AB | 52 | 9** | 15*** | R | 4 | 1 | 51 | 99 | 48 | 70 |
BU18 | 70 | 152 | 78 | 85 | A | AB | 48 | 6* | 5* | R | 2 | 0 | 54 | 92 | 49 | 52 |
BU19 | 80 | 22 | 29 | 70 | B | PR | 7 | 4 | 7* | R | 0 | 0 | 13 | 30 | 6 | 6 |
BU20 | 48 | 14 | 13 | 45 | B | PR | 0 | 4 | 7* | R | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 0 | 0 |
BU21 | 65 | 16 | 12 | 45 | B | PR | 0 | 1 | 3 | NR | 0 | −1 | 0 | 21 | 1 | 0 |
BU22 | 62 | 12 | 65 | 45 | TCM | AB | 7 | 5* | 2 | R | −1 | −1 | 5 | 15 | 7 | 5 |
BU23 | 60 | 24 | 45 | 45 | W | AB | 5 | 0 | 1 | NR | −1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 5 | 7 |
BU24 | 69 | 169 | 40 | 70 | B | PR | 7 | 2 | 2 | NR | −1 | 1 | 7 | 20 | 5 | 2 |
BU25 | 76 | 33 | 38 | 55 | B | AB | 2 | 2 | −1 | NR | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 2 |
BU26 | 64 | 115 | 58 | 30 | B | AB | 21 | 4 | 3 | NR | 1 | 0 | 27 | 41 | 14 | 17 |
BU27 | 65 | 17 | 84 | 75 | A | AB | 51 | 7* | 2 | R | 1 | −1 | 51 | 80 | 51 | 57 |
Mean | 62 | 56 | 59 | 68 | 28 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 28 | 53 | 28 | 35 | |||
SD | 10 | 52 | 26 | 19 | 26 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 23 | 37 | 26 | 32 | |||
Range | 42- 80 |
10- 169 |
12- 95 |
30- 100 |
0- 69 |
−.1- 17 |
−2- 20 |
−1- 7 |
−1- 10 |
0- 72 |
4- 100 |
0- 77 |
0- 86 |
|||
NATURAL HISTORY CONTROL GROUP | ||||||||||||||||
BUc01 | 49 | 49 | 86 | 75 | A | PR | 69 | −1 | −1 | NR | 1 | −0 | 69 | 66 | 60 | 63 |
BUc02 | 79 | 10 | 32 | 70 | B | PR | 7 | 1 | 1 | NR | 1 | 0 | 11 | 15 | 4 | 5 |
BUc05 | 49 | 67 | 32 | 75 | B | UN | 5 | −0 | −2 | NR | 1 | −1 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
BUc06 | 69 | 164 | 39 | 75 | B | PR | 6 | 2 | −2 | NR | 1 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 5 |
BUc07 | 39 | 18 | 71 | 70 | C | PR | 47 | 1 | 1 | NR | −2 | −1 | 41 | 50 | 58 | 49 |
BUc08 | 64 | 13 | 70 | 0 | A | AB | 46 | 0 | 1 | NR | −0 | 2 | 46 | 51 | 47 | 55 |
BUc09 | 62 | 21 | 92 | 75 | A | AB | 59 | 6 | −2 | R | 3 | 1 | 26 | 55 | 69 | 82 |
BUc10 | 68 | 21 | 79 | 90 | A | AB | 42 | −2 | −0 | NR | 1 | −2 | 37 | 32 | 45 | 45 |
BUc11 | 58 | 23 | 62 | 50 | B | PR | 12 | 0 | 6 | R | 0 | 4 | 10 | 25 | 20 | 20 |
BUc12 | 53 | 467 | 91 | 100 | A | AB | 72 | 2 | 2 | NR | 2 | 0 | 54 | 66 | 74 | 78 |
Mean | 59 | 85 | 66 | 68 | 36 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 31 | 37 | 38 | 40 | |||
SD | 12 | 142 | 24 | 27 | 27 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 24 | 29 | 31 | |||
Range | 39- 79 |
10- 467 |
32- 92 |
0- 100 |
5- 72 |
−2- 6 |
−2- −6 |
−2- 3 |
−2- 4 |
7- 69 |
.9- 66 |
2- 74 |
2- 82 |
Note: Treatment effect sizes (ESs) were classified using benchmarks established Robey and Beeson (Beeson & Robey, 2006):
small effect = 4.0-6.9;
medium effect = 7.0-10.0;
large effect = 10.1 + Generalization effect sizes greater than 2.0 (bold) were classified as “meaningful” as they are half the magnitude of a small effect for trained items.