Table 3.

P-Values of the significantly stronger connected network channels in the flourishing network and correlations with flourishing, subjective vitality, mind-wandering, trait rumination, and depression.

Hub nodes (seed)		t = 3.1	Flourishing		Subjective vitality		Mind-wandering		Trait rumination		Depression
		p-value	r	p	r	p	r	p	r	p	r	p
Flourishing network
lMTG (Ch 32)	rSupG (Ch 18)	0.002	0.39∗	0.01	0.13	0.387	0.30	0.05	−0.20	0.204	−0.31∗	0.041
	lSAC (Ch 36)	0.001	0.26	0.095	0.21	0.172	0.29	0.058	−0.28	0.071	−0.36∗	0.018
	lV3 (Ch 46)	0.001	0.26	0.096	0.16	0.303	0.35∗	0.023	−0.33∗	0.029	−0.20	0.203
	lV3 (Ch 47)	0.002	0.22	0.158	0.18	0.252	0.39∗	0.009	−0.30	0.05	−0.27	0.077
	rV3 (Ch 48)	0.002	0.29	0.062	0.18	0.241	0.44∗	0.003	−0.32∗	0.036	−0.31∗	0.04
	rAngG (Ch 50)	0.003	0.21	0.174	0.20	0.195	0.26	0.096	−0.26	0.089	−0.21	0.166
lFusG (Ch 43)	rSAC (Ch 28)	0.003	0.36∗	0.018	0.17	0.284	0.22	0.146	−0.35∗	0.021	−0.38∗	0.012
	rAngG (Ch 39)	0.002	0.31∗	0.04	0.12	0.451	0.19	0.231	−0.28	0.065	−0.34∗	0.028
	lV3 (Ch 46)	0.002	0.29	0.06	0.17	0.278	0.30	0.051	−0.42∗	0.005	−0.30∗	0.047
	rV3 (Ch 48)	0.001	0.30	0.053	0.15	0.34	0.43∗	0.004	−0.37∗	0.014	−0.35∗	0.021
	rAngG (Ch 50)	0.003	0.26	0.086	0.26	0.086	0.16	0.305	−0.33∗	0.032	−0.27	0.074

All variables were used as covariates in a follow-up NBS analysis of flourishing. ^∗p < 0.05; the p-value corrected for multiple comparison was p < 0.0045.