Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 28;85(2):285–303. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13787

Table 7.

Grading the evidence: secondary outcomes

Quality assessment № of patients Absolute effect Quality Importance
№ of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations Indapamide Bendroflumethiazide (95% CI)
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) (follow‐up: 1 year)
2 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Serious Not serious None 1933 4297 0.94 (−1.45, 2.25) ⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE CRITICAL
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) (follow‐up: 1 year)
3 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Serious Not serious None 1933 4355 0.88 (−0.19, 1.95) ⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE CRITICAL
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) (follow‐up: range 12–24 weeks)
3 Randomized trials Serious Not serious Not serious Serious None 29 27 −0.26 (−0.79, 0.27) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW IMPORTANT
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) (follow‐up: range 12–24 weeks)
3 Randomized trials Serious Not serious Not serious Serious None 29 27 −0.40 (−0.93, 0.14) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW IMPORTANT

CI, confidence interval