Table 3.
At least one ACD overall n (%) |
Type of ACD* | |||
Statutory ACD: preferences for care n (%) |
Statutory ACD: substitute decision-maker n (%) |
Non-statutory ACD n (%) |
||
Total sample (n=2285) | 682 (29.8) | 62 (2.7) | 250 (10.9) | 477 (20.9) |
Healthcare sector | ||||
General practice (n=503) | 16 (3.2) | 1 (0.2) | 11 (2.2) | 5 (1.0) |
Hospital (n=574) | 90 (15.7) | 15 (2.6) | 68 (11.8) | 33 (5.7) |
RACF (n=1208) | 576 (47.7) | 46 (3.8) | 171 (14.2) | 439 (36.3) |
Jurisdiction | ||||
Australian Capital Territory (n=31) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
General practice | – | – | – | – |
Hospital | – | – | – | – |
RACF | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
New South Wales (n=655) | 241 (36.8) | N/A | 19 (2.9) | 235 (35.9) |
General practice | 5 (4.3) | N/A | 4 (3.5) | 1 (0.9) |
Hospital | – | N/A | – | – |
RACF | 236 (43.7) | N/A | 15 (2.8) | 234 (43.3) |
Queensland (n=351) | 141 (40.2) | 24 (6.8) | 81 (23.1) | 67 (19.1) |
General practice | 1 (2.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.9) |
Hospital | 36 (21.7) | 10 (6.0) | 29 (17.5) | 2 (1.2) |
RACF | 104 (69.3) | 14 (9.3) | 52 (34.7) | 64 (42.7) |
South Australia (n=239) | 127 (53.1) | 33 (13.8) | 97 (40.6) | 39 (16.3) |
General practice | – | – | – | – |
Hospital | 5 (8.9) | 2 (3.6) | 3 (5.4) | 1 (1.8) |
RACF | 122 (66.7) | 31 (16.9) | 94 (51.4) | 38 (20.8) |
Tasmania (n=50) | 7 (14.0) | N/A | 6 (12.0) | 1 (2.0) |
General practice | – | N/A | – | – |
Hospital | – | N/A | – | – |
RACF | 7 (14.0) | N/A | 6 (12.0) | 1 (2.0) |
Victoria (n=959) | 166 (17.3) | 5 (0.5) | 47 (4.9) | 135 (14.1) |
General practice | 10 (2.8) | 1 (0.3) | 7 (2.0) | 3 (0.8) |
Hospital | 49 (13.9) | 3 (0.9) | 36 (10.2) | 30 (8.5) |
RACF | 107 (42.1) | 1 (0.4) | 4 (1.6) | 102 (40.2) |
A dash (–) indicates a particular sector/jurisdiction that was not represented in the study. N/A indicates a document that is not available in a particular jurisdiction.
*Participants may have more than one type of ACD.
ACD, advance care directive; RACF, residential aged care facility.