Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 21.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Immunol. 2010 May 11;47(11-12):2094–2102. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.04.002

Table 2. Activation dependent transactivation of ECR1-525 in Jurkat T cells.

Treatment ECR1_525+control ECR1_525+p65 ECR1_525+NFATc2/p
Medium 1% (±0.2)   1.2% (±1.1) 0.7% (±0.5)
PMA 1.5% (±0.6) 13.4% (±3.1) 1.5% (±0.5)
Iono 0.6% (±0.2)   0.3% (±1.1) 1.3% (±1.8)
PHA 1.3% (±1.1)   4.4% (±2.7) 1% (±1.0)
CD3 0.8% (±0.5)   5.9% (±1.4) 0.6% (±0.4)
CD28 0.8% (±0.4)   2.1% (±1.5) 0.7% (±0.7)
PMA/iono 2.5% (±1.5) 20.7% (±2.6) 2.3% (±1.0)
PMA/PHA 2.7% (±0.6) 14.5% (±3.6) 2.5% (±1.1)
CD3/CD28 1.2% (±0.4)   6.3% (±1.6) 0.7% (±0.1)

Jurkat T cells were electroporated using 2 µg ECR1_525 in combination with 1 µg of either p65 cDNA, NFATc2/p cDNA or as a control empty pCIneoHA vector. After electroporation, cells were divided and treated for 22 h with the indicated stimuli. Prior to flow cytometry measurement, the cells were stained with 1 µg/ml 7-AAD to distinguish dead cells from the living population. The table summarizes the percentages of d2EGFP expressing cells and the respective SD of three independent experiments.