Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 15;8:671. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00671

Table 4.

Prognostic performance of different lymph node staging systems before and after stratifying for NDLN.

NDLN
Variables ALL (n = 56, 747) ≥ 12 (n = 16, 699) < 12 (n = 40, 048)
C Index (95% CI) AIC C Index (95% CI) AIC C Index (95% CI) AIC
PLN (continuous) 0.668 (0.663–0.672) 290576.3 0.682 (0.677–0.688) 186085.5 0.648 (0.641–0.655) 86189.8
LNR (continuous) 0.673 (0.668–0.677) 288763.7 0.684 (0.679–0.690) 185052.7 0.651 (0.644–0.658) 86050.7
LODDS (continuous) 0.682 (0.677–0.687) 287860.5 0.691 (0.685–0.697) 184338.2 0.652 (0.644–0.661) 85970.4
AJCC 8th N stage (3) 0.666 (0.662–0.671) 288397.0 0.681 (0.675–0.686) 184632.6 0.647 (0.640–0.654) 85899.4
LNR, Rosenberg et al. (17) 0.669 (0.664–0.673) 287984.1 0.679 (0.673–0.684) 184496.2 0.649 (0.642–0.656) 85842.9
LNR, Berger et al. (16) 0.666 (0.662–0.670) 288125.3 0.674 (0.669–0.679) 184686.9 0.639 (0.632–0.646) 85856.0
LODDS, Wang et al. (26) 0.659 (0.655–0.664) 288619.9 0.665 (0.660–0.670) 184888.2 0.629 (0.621–0.636) 86265.7
LODDS, Persiani et al. (24) 0.659 (0.654–0.663) 288994.6 0.673 (0.668–0.678) 184899.7 0.616 (0.609–0.623) 86388.1

NDLN, The number of dissected lymph nodes; AIC, Akaike's Information Criterion; C Index, Harrell's consistency Index; LNR, lymph node ratio; LODDS, log odds of positive lymph nodes; AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; PLN, positive lymph node.