Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 21;10:358. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08147-0

Table 1.

Features of index SNPs in genome regions associated with pigmentation traits in the CANDELA sample

Trait/Association (P value)
Skin Hair Eye
Region SNP Candidate gene SNP annotation MI Categorical Categorical L (brightness) C (saturation) cos(H) (hue)
1q32 rs3795556 DSTYK 3’ UTR 2.1E-01 9.1E-01 6.8E-01 6.9E-03 4.0E-09 2.3E-01
5p13 rs16891982a,b SLC45A2 F374L 1.3E-117 6.3E-66 1.3E-15 4.0E-17 5.4E-07 1.8E-04
6p25 rs12203592b IRF4 Intronic 3.2E-10 2.0E-13 1.3E-12 3.2E-14 1.1E-03 4.5E-02
9p23 rs10809826a,b TYRP1 Intergenic 1.1E-03 3.3E-02 1.0E-10 5.0E-16 2.0E-08 1.2E-02
10q26 rs11198112 EMX2 Intergenic 1.7E-10 6.1E-01 3.6E-01 4.9E-01 7.7E-01 4.9E-01
11q14 rs7118677a,c GRM5 Intronic 1.1E-09 3.1E-06 6.1E-01 7.5E-01 4.8E-01 5.5E-01
11q14 rs1042602 TYR S192Y 9.1E-10 2.3E-06 7.5E-01 3.9E-01 3.6E-02 7.8E-01
11q14 rs1126809a,c TYR R402Q 2.5E-09 6.2E-06 1.2E-04 5.3E-06 7.4E-02 7.7E-04
15q13 rs4778219c OCA2 Intronic 8.3E-01 7.4E-01 4.7E-02 8.9E-02 6.2E-01 2.0E-01
15q13 rs1800407c OCA2 R419Q 6.5E-09 5.5E-02 1.1E-02 7.2E-02 1.4E-07 4.8E-06
15q13 rs1800404b OCA2 Synonymous/TFB 5.0E-11 7.0E-03 1.3E-11 5.0E-19 1.2E-06 4.1E-02
15q13 rs12913832b HERC2 Intronic 1.0E-17 7.9E-105 1.0E-200 1.0E-200 5.7E-07 1.3E-92
15q13 rs4778249a,c HERC2 Intronic 2.5E-06 1.2E-03 1.4E-10 2.5E-20 4.2E-15 5.1E-01
15q21 rs1426654b SLC24A5 T111A 1.6E-130 1.0E-18 1.0E-26 7.9E-50 6.3E-45 4.4E-01
16q24 rs885479 MC1R R163Q 1.9E-07 5.4E-02 5.6E-01 9.6E-01 8.0E-01 9.0E-01
19p13 rs2240751 MFSD12 Y182H 1.7E-10 8.2E-01 3.1E-01 9.6E-01 1.2E-01 9.1E-01
20q13 rs17422688 WFDC5 H97Y 5.2E-01 6.9E-01 8.2E-01 2.0E-01 9.0E-01 2.0E-08
22q12 rs5756492 MPST Intronic 4.6E-03 9.9E-01 2.7E-02 9.5E-03 5.0E-08 1.5E-01

Novel genomic regions are in bold. Genome-wide significant P values (<5 × 10−8) are in bold and underlined. Genome-wide suggestive significant P values (<10−5) are in bold

MI: melanin index, L: lightness, C: chroma, H: hue

aThese SNPs were obtained through imputation. Their imputation quality ‘info’ metric was ≥0.975, the median value being 0.993. The other SNPs were obtained from chip genotyping, and their ‘concordance’ metric was >0.9, the median value being 0.981

bThese SNPs have been robustly associated with pigmentation traits in previous studies, and they explain a large proportion of the phenotypic variance in our sample (see Methods). These six SNPs were therefore used to condition the GWAS in subsequent analyses

cThe independence of association signals of these SNPs from the main index SNPs in the same regions was confirmed by conditioned analyses