Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 15;7(1):205–215. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.863

Table 2.

Antioxidant and antidiabetic activity of the 70% ethanol and water extracts from onion (mean ± SEM, n = 3)

Samples IC50 (μg/ml, Mean ± SEM)a
DPPH ABTS PTP1B α‐Glucosidase AGEs
70% EtOH extracts
Red onion 10.60 ± 0.18e 7.00 ± 0.20d 0.76 ± 0.17c 5.76 ± 0.03bc 12.79 ± 0.22b
Yellow onion 4.50 ± 0.06c 6.64 ± 0.03c 0.86 ± 0.04c 3.90 ± 0.08b 12.25 ± 1.35b
Water extracts
Red onion 9.86 ± 1.40e 29.04 ± 0.11f 0.33 ± 0.01b 8.99 ± 0.56c 51.91 ± 1.53d
Yellow onion 6.77 ± 1.27d 12.03 ± 0.23e 0.30 ± 0.08b 5.44 ± 0.06bc 25.17 ± 1.75c
Positive controls
Ascorbic acid 1.27 ± 0.01b
Trolox 2.76 ± 0.05b
Ursolic acid 3.40 ± 0.34d
Acarbose 70.17 ± 4.96d
Aminoguanidine 58.47 ± 0.17e
a

The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values (μg/ml) were calculated from a log dose concentration–inhibition curve and expressed as mean ± SEM of triplicate experiments.

Mean with different superscripts letters (b–f) are significantly different with Duncan's test at < 0.05.