Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 5;54(Suppl 1):226–233. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13083

Table 1.

Vulnerable population served and facility characteristics for San Francisco mammography registry facilities 2005‐2012 by facility short and long follow‐up group (N = 8 facilities)

Short follow‐up facility group (four facilities; 15 203 mammograms) Long follow‐up facility group (four facilities; 2547 mammograms)
Vulnerable population served (N, %)
Minority served: >59% minority patients 0 3 (75.0)
Lower education attainment served: >18% patients with less than a high school education 0 2 (50.0)
Limited English proficient served: >36% patients with LEP 0 2 (50.0)
Vulnerable population served index
None (0) 4 (100) 1 (25.0)
Moderate (1‐2) 0 1 (25.0)
High (3) 0 2 (50.0)
Volume, staffing adequacy, and access (mean, SD)
Average diagnostic volume/week 87 (77) 12 (15)
FTE radiologists reading diagnostic examinations/week 5.5 (3.3) 3.3 (1.6)
Diagnostic volume/FTE ratio 250 (173) 379 (209)
Days to next available biopsy appointment 1.8 (1.3) 7.5 (6.8)
Tracking and communication (N, %)
Tracking system
Commercial 4 (100) 3 (75.0)
Homegrown 0 1 (25.0)
Facility contacts patient directly 4 (100) 2 (50.0)
Facility contacts physician directly 2 (50.0) 3 (75.0)
Responsibility for ensuring follow‐up
Facility 3 (75.0) 0
Referring MD 0 1 (25.0)
Both 1 (25.0) 3 (75.0)

FTE, full‐time‐equivalent; LEP, limited English proficiency.