Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 21;19:29. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1464-7

Table 2.

Results and group differences from the video analysis

Item Low-Fidelity High-Fidelity P-Value
Duration of examination of vital signs 7 s 7 s
Interval between taking vital signs and chest compression 8 s 6 s
Adressing the patient 85% 77%
Pain stimulus 77% 67%
Examination of breathing
 -not at all 5% 20% *(p = 0.012)
 -incorrect examination 69% 62%
 -correct examination 26% 18%
Call for help 65% 61%
Time until start of chest compression 22 s 20s
Time until ventilation 62 s 61 s
Ventilation without equipment 29% 41%
Time until defibrillator patches applied 91 s 105 s
Heart Rhythm assessed 69% 51% *(p = 0.021)
Rhythm assessed correctly 100% 92%
Continuous chest compression during rhythm assessment 31% 34%
Time to first defibrillation 151 s 154 s
Time between application of defibrillator patches to first defibrillation 59 s 59 s
Mean number of given shocks 2 2
Time between defibrillations 106 s 91 s *(p = 0.016)
Incorrect application of medication 10% 15%
placement of a venous cannula 26% 39%
30:2 ratio compliance 87% 87%
Disruption of compression >10s 44% 51%
Guedel oropharyngeal airway used 10% 7%
Continuous compression during preparation of defibrillator 42% 21% *(p = 0.017)
Pulse palpation 0% 5%
Intubation 2% 3%

Significant differences are marked with*