Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 22.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Neural Syst. 2017 Feb 24;27(6):1750023. doi: 10.1142/S012906571750023X

Table 3.

Regression results for mean burst percentage (Burst%) and mean relative spectral power in delta, theta, and beta frequency bands. The log-transform of results are shown for CLASS QS estimates and visually labelled estimates from the clinician, as well as for non-state specific EEG epochs, for 31–38 week PMA range (optimal CLASS performance). For each measure, the slope (or b-coefficient, b), standard error (SE) of b, 95% confidence interval (CI), and p < 0.05 significance is presented. In case of quadratic correlations, coefficients b1 and b2 of the equation are provided (y = a + b1x + b2x2). The alpha band power showed no significant correlations, and was therefore omitted from this table.

CLASS QS estimates Visual QS estimates Non-state specific EEG
Log Burst% b = 0.045 SE: 0.004
95% CI: (0.036 to 0.053)
linear correlation with PMA,
p < 0.001
b = 0.045 SE: 0.005
95% CI: (0.035 to 0.055)
linear correlation with PMA,
p < 0.001
b = 0.035 SE: 0.006
95% CI: (0.023 to 0.047)
linear correlation with PMA,
p < 0.001
Log relative delta power b = −0.014 SE: 0.004
95% CI: (−0.021 to −0.006)
linear correlation with PMA,
p < 0.01
b = −0.013 SE: 0.004
95% CI: (−0.022 to −0.004)
linear correlation with PMA,
p < 0.01
b = −0.010 SE: 0.005
95% CI: (−0.019 to −0.000)
linear correlation with PMA,
p < 0.05
Log relative theta power b1 = −0.679 SE: 0.284
95% CI: (−1.253 to −0.104)
b2 = 0.011 SE: 0.004
95% CI: (0.002 to 0.019)
quadratic correlation with PMA,
p < 0.05
b1 = −0.673 SE: −0.320
95% CI: (−1.334 to −0.012)
b2 = 0.010 SE: 0.005
95% CI: (0.000 to 0.020)
quadratic correlation with PMA,
p < 0.05
b1 = −0.281 SE: 0.333
95% CI: (−0.956 to 0.392)
b2 = 0.005 SE: 0.005
95% CI: (−0.005 to 0.014)
no significant correlation with PMA,
p = 0.35
Log relative beta power b1 = 1.071 SE: 0.342
95% CI: (0.377 to 1.765)
b2 = −0.016 SE: 0.005
95% CI: (−0.026 to −0.006)
quadratic correlation with PMA,
p < 0.05
b1 = 1.103 SE: 0.576
95% CI: (−0.060 to 2.267)
b2 = −0.016 SE: 0.008
95% CI: (−0.033 to −0.000)
quadratic correlation with PMA,
p = 0.056
b1 = 0.389 SE: 0.507
95% CI: (−0.646 to 1.411)
b2 = −0.007 SE: 0.007
95% CI: (−0.0203 to 0.007
no significant correlation with PMA,
p = 0.428