Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 12;14:10678. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10678

Table. Survey Instrument Used by Students (N = 60) to Evaluate the Simulation Session, With Aggregate Responses.

Question Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
1. Prereading assignments prepared me for the salicylate toxicity simulation activity. 0% 4% 9% 48% 39%
2. Briefing before the simulation was beneficial. 2% 2% 36% 35% 26%
3. Briefing before the simulation increased my confidence. 2% 5% 44% 34% 15%
4. During the simulation, I had the opportunity to practice my clinical decision-making skills. 0% 0% 8% 33% 59%
5. During the simulation, I had the opportunity to experience how time pressure can affect my clinical decision-making skills. 0% 3% 8% 23% 66%
6. During the simulation, I had the opportunity to work as part of a health care team. 0% 2% 3% 18% 77%
7. I am more confident in my ability to report information to my health care team. 0% 4% 6% 51% 39%
8. I am more confident in my understanding of the pathophysiology of salicylate toxicity. 0% 2% 0% 38% 60%
9. I am more confident in my ability to differentiate between different types of acid-base disturbances. 0% 3% 10% 44% 43%
10. Debriefing contributed to my learning. 4% 0% 0% 22% 74%
11. Debriefing was valuable in helping me select the appropriate treatments for salicylate toxicity. 3% 0% 3% 27% 66%
12. Debriefing provided adequate time to review the critical concepts related to salicylate toxicity, including acid-base disturbances. 2% 0% 3% 35% 60%
13. Debriefing provided opportunities to self-reflect on my performance during the simulation. 2% 2% 3% 38% 55%