Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Invest Dermatol. 2018 Aug 18;139(2):360–368. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.07.030

Table 2.

Trabecular bone phenotypes of the femurs by microCT analysis

Group1) Sex BMD (mg/cm3) BV/TV (%) Tb.Th (μm) Tb.N (1/mm) Tb.Sp (μm) SMI Conn.D (TV/mm3)
A M 198.9 ± 70.5 14.6 ± 2.9 37.7 ± 20.2 4.4 ± 0.1 222.7 ± 6.0 2.1 ± 0.8 207.5 ± 106.1
A F 100.2 ± 13.4 5.8 ± 2.5** 30.6 ± 4.6 3.6 ± 0.2** 277.5 ± 16.0** 2.7 ± 0.5 124.2 ± 54.5
B M 246.1 ± 12.2 17.8 ± 1.3 44.8 ± 7.7 5.7 ± 0.5 168.4 ± 13.6 1.5 ± 0.1 378.3 ± 118.0
B F 125.0 ± 24.8** 7.4 ± 2.0** 33.2 ± 3.1* 4.0 ± 0.3** 247.4 ± 22.0** 2.2 ± 0.3** 185.1 ± 52.2*
D M 210.8 ± 62.2 14.4 ± 5.7 37.9 ± 6.4 5.5 ± 0.8 178.1 ± 23.5 1.6 ± 0.5 363.3 ± 132.5
D F 150.0 ± 23.6 9.0 ± 2.0 34.5 ± 1.3 4.5 ± 0.4 218.6 ± 21.4* 2.2 ± 0.2 241.4 ± 52.6
1)

For a description of different groups, see Table 1.

Abbreviations: M, male; F, female; BMD, bone mineral density; BV/TV, relative bone volume; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; Tb.N, trabecular number; Tb.Sp, trabecular separation (marrow thickness); SMI, structure model index; Conn.D, connectivity density.

Values are expressed as mean ± SD. N = 3-5 males and females per group.

*

p< 0.05

**

p < 0.01, compared to the male mice in each group;

No statistical differences are noted in mice in Group B when compared to sex matched mice in Groups A and D.