Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 15;7(1):E33–E39. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180042

Table 2:

Results from multilevel logistic regression analysis of prevalent cases of diabetes mellitus in Saskatchewan, 2007–2012

Characteristic Geographic location; adjusted OR (95% CI)*
Saskatchewan Urban Rural
Level 2 (dissemination area)
Deprivation
Q1 (least deprived) 0.40 (0.18–0.88) 0.32 (0.13–0.78) 0.84 (0.13–5.43)
Q2 0.59 (0.29–1.22) 0.53 (0.23–1.25) 0.80 (0.16–4.01)
Q3 0.74 (0.36–1.51) 0.70 (0.31–1.63) 1.02 (0.20–5.14)
Q4 0.80 (0.38–1.68) 0.75 (0.32–1.74) 1.11 (0.20–6.23)
Q5 (most deprived) 1 (ref) 1 (ref) 1 (ref)
Geographic location
Urban 0.46 (0.27–0.79) NA NA
Rural 1 (ref) NA NA
Level 1 (indiviudal)
Income, $
0–19 999 1 (ref) 1 (ref) 1 (ref)
20 000–49 999 0.64 (0.63–0.65) 0.55 (0.54–0.57) 0.91 (0.88–0.94)
50 000–79 999 0.65 (0.64–0.67) 0.62 (0.60–0.63) 0.68 (0.66–0.71)
≥ 80 000 0.64 (0.63–0.66) 0.72 (0.70–0.73) 0.43 (0.41–0.45)
Education
Less than high school 1.51 (1.49–1.54) 1.50 (1.47–1.53) 1.43 (1.39–1.48)
Completed high school 1.08 (1.06–1.10) 1.16 (1.14–1.19) 0.87 (0.84–0.91)
Postsecondary 1 (ref) 1 (ref) 1 (ref)
−2 log pseudo-likelihood 1 235 864 1 626 750 497 563

Note: CI = confidence interval, NA = not applicable, OR = odds ratio, ref = reference.

*

Model controlling for year, age and sex.