Table 2.
Population | Sport | BMD variation | References |
---|---|---|---|
300 Norwegian female elite athletes (national level at senior or junior) 300 non-athletic controls |
66 sports | 3–20% higher BMD than controls. 3–22% higher BMD in high-impact sports compared to medium- or low-impact sports | Torstveit and Sundgot-Borgen (2005) |
15 elite male athletes 15 non-athletic controls |
Volleyball | 14% and 24% higher BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck, respectively, in volleyball players in comparison with non-athletic controls | Calbet et al. (1999) |
14 state-level female athletes 18 non-athletic controls |
Netball | 7.8%, 17.3% and 14% higher total body, hip and lumbar spine BMD in the netballers in comparison with the controls | Chang et al. (2013) |
50 male highly trained athletes 12 non-athletic controls |
12 judokas 14 karate athletes 24 water polo players |
Control group total body BMD (1.27 g/cm2) was significantly lower than the judo (1.40 g/cm2) and karate (1.36 g/cm2) group but no different to the water polo athletes (1.31 g/cm2) | Andreoli et al. (2001) |
59 competitive Finnish female athletes 25 physical active individuals 25 sedentary individuals |
27 dancers 18 squash players 14 speed skaters |
Squash players had significantly higher BMD at the lumbar spine (13%), femoral neck (16.8%), proximal tibia (12.6%) and calcaneus (18.5%) in comparison with the sedentary group. Aerobic dancers also had significantly higher BMD at the loaded sites in comparison with the sedentary group, ranging from 5.3 to 13.5% | Heinonen et al. (1995) |
60 athletes 15 non-athletic controls |
15 runners 15 swimmers 15 triathletes 15 cyclists |
Runners had significantly higher total body, femoral neck and leg BMD than controls and swimmers as well as higher leg BMD than cyclists | Duncan et al. (2002) |