Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 30;119(1):29–47. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-4007-8

Table 2.

BMD variation across different sports

Population Sport BMD variation References
300 Norwegian female elite athletes (national level at senior or junior)
300 non-athletic controls
66 sports 3–20% higher BMD than controls. 3–22% higher BMD in high-impact sports compared to medium- or low-impact sports Torstveit and Sundgot-Borgen (2005)
15 elite male athletes
15 non-athletic controls
Volleyball 14% and 24% higher BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck, respectively, in volleyball players in comparison with non-athletic controls Calbet et al. (1999)
14 state-level female athletes
18 non-athletic controls
Netball 7.8%, 17.3% and 14% higher total body, hip and lumbar spine BMD in the netballers in comparison with the controls Chang et al. (2013)
50 male highly trained athletes
12 non-athletic controls
12 judokas
14 karate athletes
24 water polo players
Control group total body BMD (1.27 g/cm2) was significantly lower than the judo (1.40 g/cm2) and karate (1.36 g/cm2) group but no different to the water polo athletes (1.31 g/cm2) Andreoli et al. (2001)
59 competitive Finnish female athletes
25 physical active individuals
25 sedentary individuals
27 dancers
18 squash players
14 speed skaters
Squash players had significantly higher BMD at the lumbar spine (13%), femoral neck (16.8%), proximal tibia (12.6%) and calcaneus (18.5%) in comparison with the sedentary group. Aerobic dancers also had significantly higher BMD at the loaded sites in comparison with the sedentary group, ranging from 5.3 to 13.5% Heinonen et al. (1995)
60 athletes
15 non-athletic controls
15 runners
15 swimmers
15 triathletes
15 cyclists
Runners had significantly higher total body, femoral neck and leg BMD than controls and swimmers as well as higher leg BMD than cyclists Duncan et al. (2002)