Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 13;6(2):1801452. doi: 10.1002/advs.201801452

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Morphology of the KG/PVA cryogel. A,C,F) The polyP‐free “KG2/PVA‐cryogel” sample and B,D,F) the polyP containing “KG2/PVA/polyP:NP‐cryogel” sample were analyzed; SEM. A–D) At lower magnification the cryogels comprises a meshwork, interspersed with extensive porous/channel‐traversed lacunas and openings. Using high resolution SEM microscopy the plain surfaces of the polyP‐lacking “KG2/PVA‐cryogel” samples are devoid of any nanoparticles (E), while those formed in the “KG2/PVA/polyP:NP‐cryogel” are abundantly interspersed with nanoparticles (NP) (F). The corresponding partial images are in the same magnification.