Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Oct 1;28(1):32–40. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0367

Table 1.

Correlation coefficients and mean absolute differences between model-based state estimates and NCHS urban-rural area estimates, and BRFSS direct state estimates, by test type.

Up-to-date with mammographya Rarely or never had a mammogramb
Test Test estimate Mean (%) Median (%) Test estimate Mean (%) Median (%)
Spearman correlation coefficient State estimates (n=51)
Model-Based 0.98 77.66 78.44 0.95 11.56 11.27
BRFSS 77.58 78.10 11.60 11.17
Mean absolute differences 0.79 0.95
Spearman correlation coefficient NCHS urban-rural stimatesc (n=6)
Model-Based 0.94 77.72 77.72 0.94 11.68 11.73
BRFSS 77.43 78.09 11.91 11.70
Mean absolute differences 1.03 0.92

Notes: NCHS=National Center for Health Statistics

a

Up-to-date = having had the most recent mammogram within 2 years;

b

Rarely or never = having had the most recent mammogram ≥5 years before the survey interview or never.

c

Metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas were based on the 2013 6 categories of NCHS urban-rural classification Scheme for counties.

BRFSS percentages are weighted to the study population