Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 22;18:6. doi: 10.1186/s12938-019-0627-4

Table 3.

Comparison of our proposed method with other CADs systems

CAD systems Sensitivity (%) Average false positive
Zhang et al. [15] 82.98 11.76
Ye et al. [16] 90.2 8.20
Choi et al. [17] 95.28 2.27
Setio et al. [18] 90.1 4.00
Ma et al. [19] 88.9 4.00
Liu et al. [20] 89.4 2.00
Our study 95.0 5.62

CAD computer-aided diagnosis