Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 29;37(1):26–43. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2018.1509303

Table A2.

Spearman’s rho correlations between subjective birth experience and attachment goal-related dimensions.

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
1. Maternal age 1                          
2. Baby age –12 1                        
3. Household income .29*** –.21** 1                      
4. Multiparous .27 –.05 .07 1                    
5. Caesarean .078 .05 .15* –.03 1                  
6. Accuracy of expectations .05 –.10 –.04 .15* –.08 1                
7. Perceived control –.10 –.06 .10 .08 –.12 .45*** 1              
8. Social support –.03 –.02 –.08 –.04 –.04 .30*** .34*** 1            
9. Satisfaction with birth –.04 –.10 .03 .08 –.14* .66*** .59*** .44*** 1          
10. Perceived availability of AF .00 .14* –.00 –.08 .11 –.28*** –.20** –.38*** –.34*** 1        
11. Feared loss of AF –.02 .11 –.10 –.10 .06 –.22*** –.19** –.32*** –.28*** .60*** 1      
12. Proximity-seeking –.07 –.04 –.11 .02 .03 –.10 –.10 –.15* –.05 .05 .20** 1    
13. Separation protest –.14* .00 –.15* .02 –.04 –.19** –.12* –.14* –.13* .30*** .32*** .32*** 1  
14. Use of AF –.02 .31 –.00 .01 .06 –.13* –.20** –.20** –.18** .59*** .40*** .08 .17** 1

*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001, Bonferroni corrected significance levels are underlined < .003.

AF, attachment figure.