Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 16;17(1):16–26. doi: 10.2450/2018.0213-17

Table II.

Meta-analysis-based effect estimates as input for the cost-effectiveness model.

Event probabilities are shown for patients in the liberal and restrictive groups. The probabilities of complications in the restrictive group were calculated with a pooled relative risk (RR) compared to the liberal group. The lower and upper bounds of the 95% confidence interval (CI) are given.

Probabilities Pooled effect liberal group Pooled relative risk Effect estimate restrictive group in % (95% CI) p-value
Non-cardiac surgery

Sepsis (total) 19.32% 0.30 5.72% (5.41–6.05) <0.01

 a) Sepsis with pneumonia 11.08% 0.14 1.56% (1.41–1.74) <0.01

 b) Sepsis without pneumonia 8.24% 0.50 4.16% (4.00–4.31) <0.01

Acute renal failure 4.02% 0.49 1.98% (1.65–2.38) 0.01

Acute myocardial infarction 5.96% 0.76 4.50% (3.58–5.66) 0.02

Acute stroke 1.58% 0.63 1.00% (0.64–1.55) <0.01

Total (any complication) 30.88% 0.43 13.20% (11.28–15.64)

Cardiac surgery

Sepsis (total) 11.31% 0.41 4.61% (3.39–6.29) 0.04

 a) Sepsis with pneumonia 6.48% 0.41 2.65% (1.94–3.60) <0.01

 b) Sepsis without pneumonia 4.82% 0.41 1.97% (1.45–2.68) <0.01

Acute renal failure 2.50% 0.38 0.94% (0.78–1.13) <0.01

Acute myocardial infarction 3.03% 0.02 0.07% (0.02–0.18) <0.01

Acute Stroke 1.90% 0.35 0.66% (0.54–0.81) <0.01

Total (any complication) 18.73% 0.34 6.28% (4.73–8.4)