Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 11;8(2):e1528411. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1528411

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival in EOC patients.

  Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Variables HR (95 % CI) p value* HR (95 % CI) p value*
Age
(≥ 45 vs. < 45)
1.448 (1.087–1.928) 0.011 1.215 (0.825–1.791) 0.324
CA125
(> 1000 vs. ≤ 1000)
1.313 (1.042–1.655) 0.021 1.080 (0.803–1.454) 0.610
Pathologic grade
(1,2 vs. 3)
0.681 (0.492–0.943) 0.002 0.942 (0.637–1.392) 0.764
FIGO tumor stage
(I, II vs. III, IV)
0.355 (0.229–0.489) 0.0001 0.467 (0.287–0.760) 0.002
Histopathology
(Serous vs. other)
0.606 (0.420–0.875) 0.008 0.753 (0.421–1.348) 0.341
Pelvic lymph node metastasis
(Yes vs. No)
1.783 (1.264–2.515) 0.001 NA NA
Abdominal aorta lymph node metastasis
(Yes vs. No)
2.401 (1.590–3.626) 0.0001 NA NA
Residual disease
(< 1cm vs. ≥ 1cm)
0.506 (0.375–0.683) 0.0001 0.492 (0.348–0.694) 0.0001
Treatment
(CIT vs. Control)
0.536 (0.369–0.778) 0.001 0.600 (0.369–0.975) 0.039

*, Cox regression;

HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; NA: not analyzed; CIT: cellular immunotherapy.