Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 23;14(1):e0211051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211051

Table 4. Descriptive statistics and comparisons between conditions.

N = 100 FA EO FA EC FT EO FT EC FF EO FF EC OD EO OD EC ON EO ON EC BD OD BN EO
Descriptive
stats
AP 12.4 13.2 13.8 15.6 13.4 17.2 15.8 46.6 16.2 45.3 48.9 46.2
(4.6) (5.0) (4.7) (5.8) (6.4) (6.1) (6.7) (41.7) (6.7) (39.7) (29.9) (28.4)
ML 6.2 6.3 7.1 9.4 7.1 9.4 7.5 11.5 13.8 85.3 152.2 149.6
(2.9) (2.4) (2.8) (2.7) (2.8) (2.7) (2.9) (4.3) (7.5) (83.0) (86.7) (90.6)
Axes:
AP vs.ML
-50% -52% -49% -40% -44% -33% -13% 67% -15% 89% 211% 224%
Vision:
EC vs. EO
AP 7% 13% 28% 195% 180% N/A
ML 2% 33% 54% 463% 520% N/A

Top rows show the descriptive statistics via medians and interquartile ranges across standing tasks. Unit is mg (g = earth acceleration unit). Below, relative differences between conditions and inferential tests (Wilcoxon rank tests) are presented. Significant results are in bold print. Significance thresholds (Bonferroni-corrected for multiple comparisons) are: p = 0.004 for axes (12 comparisons); and p = 0.01 for vision (5 comparisons). ML: mediolateral. AP: anteroposterior. EC: eyes closed. EO: eyes open. For other abbreviations, see Table 2.