Table 4.
Variable | Trait | Simple linear models | Mixed model diagnostics | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | Trait | Trait2 | Model P | r 2 | Marginal r2 | Conditional r2 | ||
Pod count | A mass | –1.2 | 11.8 | –14.1 | 0.087 | 0.11 | 0.071 | 0.757 |
A area | 1.1 | –0.1 | 0.002 | <0.001 | 0.466 | 0.204 | 0.751 | |
Log LMA | 60.9 | –73.2 | 22.3 | <0.001 | 0.685 | 0.643 | 0.75 | |
Leaf N | –2.3 | 1.8 | –0.2 | 0.084 | 0.112 | 0.127 | 0.79 | |
Leaf C | –16.2 | 0.64 | –0.01 | 0.003 | 0.239 | 0.043 | 0.715 | |
Log leaf C:N | –14.7 | 30.5 | –14.6 | 0.164 | 0.083 | 0.122 | 0.799 | |
Log WUE | 1.5 | –0.4 | –0.4 | 0.232 | 0.067 | 0.019 | 0.743 | |
g s | 1.7 | –1.4 | 0.7 | 0.12 | 0.096 | 0.022 | 0.766 | |
Log leaf area | –11.0 | 14.3 | –4.1 | <0.001 | 0.442 | 0.282 | 0.792 | |
Seed count | A mass | –1.0 | 12.5 | –14.9 | 0.048 | 0.135 | 0.088 | 0.772 |
A area | 1.4 | –0.03 | 0.002 | <0.001 | 0.453 | 0.199 | 0.77 | |
Log LMA | 71.0 | –84.0 | 25.4 | <0.001 | 0.625 | 0.545 | 0.714 | |
Leaf N | –2.5 | 2.2 | –0.3 | 0.03 | 0.153 | 0.128 | 0.766 | |
Leaf C | –40.1 | 1.8 | –0.02 | 0.001 | 0.294 | 0.067 | 0.717 | |
Log Leaf C:N | –18.2 | 37.8 | –18.0 | 0.068 | 0.12 | 0.119 | 0.774 | |
Log WUE | 2.3 | –1.8 | 0.8 | 0.291 | 0.057 | 0.023 | 0.782 | |
g s | 2.1 | –1.4 | 0.8 | 0.11 | 0.1 | 0.008 | 0.76 | |
Log leaf area | –8.7 | 11.6 | –3.2 | <0.001 | 0.478 | 0.34 | 0.839 |
Simple linear regression models including a second-order polynomial term were used to assess relationships across the entire data set, whereas linear mixed-effects models were employed to describe the relationship between traits and nodules while accounting for the nested structure of data. Marginal r2 values therefore correspond to the variance in pod and seed counts explained by traits alone, while the conditional r2 value corresponds to the variance in reproduction explained by traits as well as the nested random effects (namely sample blocks nested within management conditions).
Sample sizes for all models are n = 134 plants, except for WUE and gs analyses where n = 133 plants. Pod and seed count data were log transformed prior to analyses.